Today in class, we
discussed the different rape cases in our books.
The first one we
discussed was called 1 Hour in Paris, in which an American woman was raped in
Paris. It was published in 2014, which is quite new, in comparison to some of
the others (mine was published in 2002). What sets this apart is the fact that
it was international. The woman was raped by an acquaintance, which falls in
line with what we have examined in this case. However, there is no athleticism
at work here. The other additional aspects of our rape culture might also seem
to not be a factor here. He was drunk, she was only sipping her wine, and did
not really want to drink. Additionally, this case fits into the dominant idea
that there will be a significant violent aspect to the rape that is easily
identifiable, since she was raped at knife-point. The other interesting aspect
was the difference in police response. We have talked in class that the police
officers in America downplay the experiences and reactions of the targets and
survivors, but the reactions of the police in France were very different in
that they immediately took her claims to heart.
The second book we
discussed was the Invisible Target. That one was about an abusive relationship
between a teacher and a high school student. The male teacher began an extended
statutory rape relationship with the young student. I thought the most
interesting part of the story was the idea of the grooming, which goes towards
what we know about rapists. The fact that he groomed her and targeted her shows
that this was not a loving relationship, which is often what the defense/rapist
will bring up. Another interesting part was that the girl did not have a great
relationship with her father, which led her to seek that attention elsewhere.
When he effectively rejects her at the beginning of their relationship so that
she would want him more, he is definitely exhibiting a power play. And as we
know, rape is about power, not sex.
The last one we
discussed was Perfectly Broken. One of the things I found interesting about
hearing about this book was the fact that she added a large faith-based
component. I know some people in class seemed dismayed that there was such a
large religious component, but I think that is beneficial and different than
what we have read before. In many of the books and accounts we have read, the
women tried to find the strength to overcome their rapes by themselves. That is
obviously awesome, but I think that finding her faith again in this account
would have been very beneficial. I imagine that finding her place in her faith
again would allow her to (potentially) look at humanity in a healthier way
after having that view so fractured.
Two of the three
accounts today were acquaintance rape, which is closer to what we know about
the statistics of rape, but overall in class, there has been more discussion of
the stranger rapes that occur. Most of the books we looked at had the “classic”
narrative of having some man (and they have all been men) jump out of the
bushes and assault an unsuspecting or kindhearted woman (kindhearted in the
case of the woman who was asked to give directions). This goes back to the idea
that with all these stories, they are more marketable than telling the
population they might know someone who is a rapist. The other dissimilarity
between one of the books was that it was an extended abuse. The rest of the
accounts of rape were only one instance instead of many years.
No comments:
Post a Comment