One of the pieces of research that Krakauer uses heavily in
the first part of chapter 10 is the study by Lisak and Miller titled “Repeat
Rape and Multiple Offending Among Undetected Rapists.” The study uses a survey
approach to look at if rapists not in jail were repeat offenders like the ones
incarcerated. In their words, “The goal of the present study was to determine
the proportion of self-reported rapists who commit multiple acts of rape
undetected by the criminal justice system and to examine whether some
proportion of rapists also admit to other forms of interpersonal violence”
(75). The study did indeed show that most of the acts in their survey that
counted as rapes were committed by a small number of men. Basically, the men
that raped once, usually raped again. Despite the fact that the study was
conducted at a university, the authors wrote that the recidivism of the
participants was in contrast to the “prevalent image of a male college student
who, under the influence of alcohol, mistakenly crosses the line between sexual
pressure and rape” (81).
Krakauer uses this study to underscore the UM victims’
concerns of their attackers committing the same crime later. For those who were
attacked and decided to report it, this reasoning was part of their final
decision to report it. By presenting this scientific study that looked at
actual college students, Krakauer strengthens his and the women’s arguments.
The other research that Krakauer presents in the first few
pages of chapter 10 is the 2009 study that supports the 2002 study by Lisak and
Miller. This study is titled “Reports of Rape Reperpetration by Newly Enlisted
Male Navy Personnel.” The study corroborates the findings of the previous one.
It concludes that “Regardless of time period, participants reported primarily
perpetrating completed rape rather than attempted rape, perpetrating multiple
ACR [attempted or completed rape] incidents rather than single ACR incidents, using
substances more frequently than force, and knowing their victim rather than
targeting a stranger” (213). In a single sentence, the study sums up everything
that Krakauer has been asserting. The fact that the study found the same
occurrences as the previous one is a support to the arguments being made
because it is more recent and the more data is collected, the more reliable the
findings are. He uses this study like the earlier one: to support what the
victims have reported.
The journal that both of these studies were published in is Violence and Victims and is interdisciplinary. It covers "interpersonal violence and victimization" among the different disciplines.
Lisak, David, and Paul M. Miller. “Repeat Rape and Multiple
Offending Among Undetected Rapists.” Violence
and Victims, 17, no. 1, 2002.
McWhorter, Stephanie K., Valerie A. Stander, Lex L. Merrill,
Cynthia J. Thomsen, and Joel S. Milner. “Reports of Rape Reperpetration by
Newly Enlisted Male Navy Personnel.” Violence
and Victims, 24, no. 2, 2009.
No comments:
Post a Comment